Henry Fieldings Views On Social And Political Hypocrisy As Seen In Tom Jones

Your First and Last NameInstructor s Title and Last NameCourse Department and NumberDateHypocrisy in Tom JonesIn Tom Jones Fielding is attempting little less than a redefinition of virtue . Tom s moral superiority over characters such(prenominal) as Blifil is established in a manner which has non always satisfied all examineers , for Tom is sensual and foolhardy , while Blifil is prudent and law-abiding William Cobbett , writing in 1829 in his Advice to Young Men , asked How is it possible for young people to read such a book , and to look upon liness , sobriety , fealty , and frugality , as virtues (quoted in Sambrock , 1973 ,.158 . Samuel Richardson in a letter in 1751 called the novel a dissolute book (quoted in Paulson Lockwood , 1969 ,br 238 , and Lady Mary Wortley Montagu is recorded as saying that she was risque [Fielding] did not himself perceive that he had made Tom Jones a scoundrel (quoted in Paulson Lockwood ,. 359 .

Each of these critics seems to miss the point that it is the ordinary trappings of respectability and lawfulness that Fielding is questioning . As Martin Price argues , The central theme in Fielding s scat is the opposition between the flow of soul - of selfless munificence - and the structures - screens , defenses , moats of indifference - that people build round themselves (Price , 1964 ,. 287 . These defenses and screens are the forms of loving - legality , prudent self-interest , restraint - which by their really nature encourage hypocritical practices . It is easy to appear to be...If you trust to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .