A debate on the arbitrary argument for the immorality of homosexuality.

Saying that homosexuality is wrong because it is unnatural is ridiculous.

1. The descriptive laws of nature. The laws of nature do non support homosexuality because it is not believed to be a act that takes place in nature.

crotchet does in detail occur in nature. There is a such involvement as a homosexual animal. You be not have to follow the laws of nature and there is no real answer for doing so. It is impossible for a homosexual to be violating the laws of nature.

2. The schmalzy as a form of the unnatural.

Saying that homosexuality is artificial and not essential to human life.

That which is artificial is not always bad. Without artificial devices many a(prenominal) lives would not exist because of diseases that these artificial devices cure.

3. Anything rare or abnormal is unnatural. Homosexuality is not the normal thing that battalion choose, which makes it uncommon and therefore unnatural.

Just because a behavior is uncommon does not mean that it is condemnable. There is no reason to conceive of that uncommon behavior is morally wrong. There are many things that are abnormal but that does not make them ethically wrong.

4. Any use of an organ or an instrument that is depraved to its principal purpose or function in unnatural.



Homosexuality is promoting the misuse of ones sexual organs. In this misuse the organ is no longer doing the function for which it was made.

You cannot condemn homosexuality on the theme that it is contrary to its purpose. Many body parts are utilise for something aside from their primary function. Such as teething that are used for tearing a package open. We would say that teeth are to be used for chewing and nothing more. solely using teeth to open something is not morally wrong.

If you extremity to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.