Confucianism as compared to Militarism, Daoism and Legalism

The fist emperor of the Qin Dynasty did an excellent job of creating a linked empire. Prior to the Qin Dynasty, the people were not united into on extended ground, and there were usually much opposition to the emperor, as intumesce as conflicts about who was actually in charge. The first Qin emperor butterfly had all of this under control, through and through Legalism he took over more or less Chinese states, and united them under one centralized state. This snip there was no conflict about who was in charge. The touch where he went wrong was his continuous use of Legalism throughout his reign. The virtually efficient demeanor to keep his power would have been to get that the people of his state did not need to be controlled through Legalism. The people of China needed to be respected as people, and not just as a tool of the state and of the military. He should have transgressed from Legalism alone to a mixture of Confucianism, Daoism, Militarism as well as some of the Legalist points of view.

The outmatch way to render why a mixture of these four schools would have been the best way to run the empire is to know three primary(prenominal) points about each, and what aspects could have been best for the country as a whole. So, the first thing to know about Legalism is that the states interests argon regularise ahead of all human and moral concerns.

The six parasites are: rites and music, odes and history, cultivation and goodness, filial devotion and brotherly love, sincerity and trustworthiness, law and integrity, humanness and rightness, criticism of the army and being ashamed of fighting...

One way in which the Emperor actually accomplished this was to actually rationalise all of the books supporting Confucianism and Daoism. After the books were...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.