In this test I will argue that torture is always virtuously wrong. I will do this through a detailed examination of the ticking bomb scenario which is often used as a justification for torture in extreme cases. later explaining the scenario and the deontological and consequentialist approaches to it, I will discuss its flaws. One section will address the immediate weaknesses of the scenario, and another will look at the wider implications of a decision to torture. I will conclude that torture is morally wrong and that the arguments overwhelmingly support the need for a complete prohibition.
However, I also recognise the moral fuss of the ticking bomb decision and accept that this provides a mitigating chemical element for those who choose to torture in these circumstances.
Deontologists, Consequentialists and the Ticking Bomb
The ticking bomb scenario is a commonly cited moral problem that causes us to question our moral priorities. It supposes that a plot has been discovered to undo areas of a city with bombs which are soon to explode. It would be unrealizable to evacuate the city in time but potential to disarm the bombs if they could be found. A suspect, who knows the location of the bombs, is arrested by the law of nature but refuses to divulge the information during...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.