Should The Sentencing Process In The U. S. Be Changed? Why Or Why Not?

Running Head : US SENTENCING SYSTEMBeyond Reasonable DoubtNameSchoolProfessorSubjectBeyond Reasonable DoubtCourts dish as instruments of legal expert . The law mandates that adjudicate members of the jury and lawyers should altogether make sure that there is proper administration of justice . More than any thing else , the law should always prevail and the offender should justifiedly get the penalisation that he deserves . The law prescribes corresponding penalisation for every violation of the law and they vary based on the elements present when the crime was committed p Ideally , the indicated punishment provided in the law should be imposed upon the offender still , certain instances and circumstances during and after the crime tend to necessitate the imposition of such sentences . In this regard , there are parties who song at times that justice was not correctly met out .

There are some who even claim that the courts , the jury and the judges made a very unsportsmanlike predicament thus , their decision should be abhorred . This is the reason why appeals are available to the adverse party , in contingency he wants the decision of the lower court to be reviewedAlthough judges and members of the jury are judge to do the right thing , they cannot do this at all time . Human limitations would bring down that every individual is prone to committing mistakes thus they cannot be expected to always make the right and just predicament . In this regard , the courts have made available to adverse parties , the election to appealThrough making an...If you want to get a full essay, cast it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .