Review of Article "Asymmetric Reactions to Work Group Sex Diversity among Men and Women" Written By Jennifer A. Chatman and Charles A. O'reilly

Introduction:The article explores how work group sex news report influences work force and women and how this affects firm - procedure. Past researches indicated that demographic similarities yielded improved financial performance (Byrne, 1971) yet the recent findings estimate that women expressed a great exchangeablelihood of gender diversity than men. This paper is the first to relieve why variations in work group sex composition might affect men and women differently while precedent research findings may only seem to fit similarity-attraction predictions establish on limited samples.

Theory/Hypotheses:The theories of Status expectations and Similarity-attraction underpin the understand?s hypotheses. Kanters (1977) idea that men and women will be in addition affected by being underrepresented is adapted to hypothesize that some(prenominal) sexes will prefer membership in higher-status work groups. However, they in like manner identified that the likelihood of transferring from current work group is greater by women in female-dominated groups than by men in male-dominated groups. This tell them to think which factors indicate the nominal head/absence of gender diversity. On the basis of a categorization scheme, four categories were made - Homogeneous, said(prenominal) Sex Dominates, Balanced and Other Sex dominates. In this manner, they hypothesized that factors like Work group cooperation, affirmatory affect and Normative commitment to the organization drew out different results in each(prenominal) category.

Methodology:The research uses reliable, high-quality, primary data collected by survey of employees to capture their preferences. The researchers use a quantitative nest in empirical testing using statistical techniques (Martins, et. al., 1999); moreover a qualitative strategy is adopted for deriving hooked Variables by selecting the extent to which the respondents agreed with each statement. They used Caldwell, Chatman, and O?Reilly?s (1990) eight- percentage point scale to assess Normative commitment, measured Positive affect using the ten-item scale from the PANAS and constructed a five item scale to measure Work group cooperation. Causality shows presence/absence of gender...

If you want to get a full essay, high society it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .