Future Development of Christianity

As the world becomes really more spherical, it becomes more put uping of diversity and individualism as opposed to nationalism. The driving force behind this change is economic. In a global marketplace every wiz is a potential manufacturer and consumer. Suddenly, ideological differences become secondary to commercial possibilities. In The trinity quake, Alvin Toffler predicts a future that is based much more on individualism that nationalism. This is not only true for individual touchs, care a chosen religion, scarcely it is also true on a national level, like communism. We have seen social systems split over the past two decades as formally tidy individual nations suffered the forces of change as the world of nations became a global marketplace. No longer was it productive to adopt separatist policies. giving trade and tolerance of diversity became global watch words. As Toffler comments, the information age has allowed the masses to fragment into smaller groups who make out similar beliefs, instead of one mass group subject to be led collectively by the nose from one spiritual belief, "Today, instead of masses of people all receiving the resembling messages, smaller de-massified groups receive and send large amounts of their own mental imagery to one another. As the entire society permutations toward Third Wave diversity, the new media refle

"Miguel de Unamuno: Catholic Atheist." hypertext transfer protocol://www.hypertext.com/atheisms//unamuno.html Feb. 28, 1999: 1-2.

Litonjua, M. D. Liberation Theology. Maryland, Univ. Press of America, 1998.

Alper, M. The ?God' Part of the Brain. Rogue Press, 1998.

Nietzsche, F. The Portable Nietzsche. Trans. and ed. Walter Kaufman. impudently York, Penguin, 1982.

While the majority of individuals still find it impossible to accept the empirical dilemma without some form of external contend mechanism, we have at least spring upd in our conscious adoption of that reality more than we had when Nietzsche unveiled it.

Of course, this is not to say with 90% of the American public believing in God that at that place has been any collective gestalt from Christianity to existentialism in the United States in the past 100 years. However, we have progressed past thinking that anyone entertain existential beliefs is necessarily a madman. Therefore, if we do not ruler out the possibility of the unknown, we may possibly evolve as a species to have a less neurotic answer psychologically from consciously confronting the existential dilemma. This coincide with Michael Alper's belief that our belief in God has been psychologically evolved in us to check the psyche from the shock of confronting the existential dilemma in a time when we were more primitive organic beings. From Alper's perspective, we may evolve to a place of conscious recognition that accepting the existential dilemma is accepting our own nature, an acceptance that may not only elevate our quality of life here and now, but also one that may toll a oddment knell to Christianity in future, "If it's true that there is no god, soul, spirit, or afterlife, then let's accept ourselves for what we are and make the most of it. mayhap such an acceptance might help us to shift our priorities from the here-after to the here-and-now, to deter future religiously incited wars, and, ultimately, to maximize our chance of procuring the gr
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.