Elliott's lead depicts what occurred when she divided her class into two groups of students based on blue versus br profess eye color. Depending on the group assignment, Elliott either praised or criticized each group over the course of two days. Children had the opportunity to be in some(prenominal) groups and those in the superior group on both days adopted patronizing, critical, and biased attitudes towards who were in the putatively inferior group ("Frontline," 2005).
The film was created by Elliott in 1968 after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King and was use as a teachi
Having viewed both films, it is difficult to choose which is most compelling or powerful. Elliott's film is brief and to the point.
It represents a somewhat simplistic sociological look into and one that a university ethics committee today capacity consider inappropriate because of the possibility that students would be psychologically damage by being placed in the "inferior" group. From my own perspective, the main problem with this film is that while Elliott's intentions were good and she did install an important point about stereotypes and racial and class categories, the mental synthesis of her original exercise was inherently unethical. Her subjects were very young and thither appears to have been no oversight of this class activity.
Both films are interesting in that they allow participants in social experiments to reverberate on those experiences after some substantial amount of clip has passed. Each film has its own focus, but taken together, illustrate the fact that American society is very much polarized along lines constructed by race, gende
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.